🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a fresh playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but features a few key changes:

• Each team includes only 8 human participants, with the remaining made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by human gamers grant full XP, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, this mode lives up to its title: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, since it provides additional choices for players looking for different ways to enjoy the title. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Player Reactions: From Fury to Support

"People want real players. Avoid making the errors of your rivals," reads a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," comments a different user. At the same time, in community forums, a player remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," while another lists everything they consider to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this bot mode."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this game 24/7. Let them strike a balance," adds a different comment. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Concerns and Community Input

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it could increase wait times even longer for other modes because of the sheer number of playlists in the game already. Similarly, certain regions already encounter mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that a previous feature was promised to provide complete rewards, including AI matches, but that was removed when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. Thus this new playlist feels like the player base meeting them in the middle, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the devs "dropping the ball significantly, I had great enjoyment in the initial release, what prompted them to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

If Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and acting on feedback. Assignments being too difficult got fixed very quickly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, if their data indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.